Continuity and catastrophic risk
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Suppose that a decision-maker’s aim, under certainty, is to maximize some continuous value, such as lifetime income or social welfare. Can decision-maker rationally satisfy what has been called ‘continuity for easy cases’ while at the same time satisfying seems be widespread intuition against full-blown continuity axiom of expected utility theory? In this note I argue answer ‘no’: given transitivity and weak trade-off principle, cases violates anti-continuity intuition. end by exploring an even weaker condition consistent with aforementioned
منابع مشابه
Catastrophic Risk Evaluation
Interim Reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work.
متن کاملCatastrophic medical expenditure risk.
We propose a measure of household exposure to particularly onerous medical expenses. The measure can be decomposed into the probability that medical expenditure exceeds a threshold, the loss due to predictably low consumption of other goods if it does and the further loss arising from the volatility of medical expenses above the threshold. Depending on the choice of threshold, the measure is co...
متن کاملRisk averse decision making under catastrophic risk
A nonstandard probabilistic setting for modeling of the risk of catastrophic events is presented. It allows random variables to take on infinitely large negative values with non-zero probability, which corresponds to catastrophic consequences unmeasurable in monetary terms, e.g. loss of human lives. Thanks to this extension, the safety-first principle is proved to be consistent with traditional...
متن کاملContinuity and completeness under risk
Suppose somenon-degenerate preferencesR, with strict part P , over risky outcomes satisfy Independence. Then, when they satisfy any two of the following axioms, they satisfy the third. Herstein–Milnor: for all lotteries p, q, r , the set of a’s for which ap + (1 − a)qRr is closed. Archimedean: for all p, q, r there exists a > 0 such that if pPq, then ap + (1 − a)rPq. Complete: for all p, q, eit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economics and Philosophy
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1474-0028', '0266-2671']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267121000146